CaseDocker Case Locator

HATHWAY DIGITAL LTD. MUMBAI THRU. AUTH.REPRESEN./POWER OF ATTORNY HOLDER MR.FAHEEM AHMAD IDRISI vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. FINANCE , NEW DELHI AND OTHERS at Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench

Court: Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench
Case type: Tax

HATHWAY DIGITAL LTD. MUMBAI THRU. AUTH.REPRESEN./POWER OF ATTORNY HOLDER MR.FAHEEM AHMAD IDRISI vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. FINANCE , NEW DELHI AND OTHERS is a Tax connected with Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench. This public overview records the court, jurisdiction, year, and case reference so people can identify the matter before using CaseDocker for authenticated tracking and collaboration.

Full case timeline, alerts, orders, and tracking are available after signup.

Case status and court context

The matter is associated with Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench. Its public reference is 9de1eb0c8f96, and the available year information is recently indexed.

Jurisdiction

The public jurisdiction or bench context for this case is Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench.

Case management with CaseDocker

CaseDocker helps legal teams organize court matters, calendar updates, documents, parties, and internal work without exposing private workspace data on this public page.

Frequently asked questions

What is HATHWAY DIGITAL LTD. MUMBAI THRU. AUTH.REPRESEN./POWER OF ATTORNY HOLDER MR.FAHEEM AHMAD IDRISI vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. FINANCE , NEW DELHI AND OTHERS?

HATHWAY DIGITAL LTD. MUMBAI THRU. AUTH.REPRESEN./POWER OF ATTORNY HOLDER MR.FAHEEM AHMAD IDRISI vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. FINANCE , NEW DELHI AND OTHERS is a public case listing for Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench. This page gives only limited public-identification details.

Does this page contain full case records?

No. Full case files, documents, notes, and team activity remain inside authenticated CaseDocker workspaces.