CaseDocker Case Locator

ENTERTAINMENT SOCIETY OF GOA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER SHRI. VENANCIO FURTADO Vs RITZA WINE PVT. LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI. PRAKASH SANKPAL AND 2 ORS. (2010) at High Court of Bombay at Goa

Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa
Case type
Interim
Year
2010

ENTERTAINMENT SOCIETY OF GOA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER SHRI. VENANCIO FURTADO Vs RITZA WINE PVT. LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI. PRAKASH SANKPAL AND 2 ORS. is a Interim connected with High Court of Bombay at Goa. This public overview records the court, jurisdiction, year, and case reference so people can identify the matter before using CaseDocker for authenticated tracking and collaboration.

Full case timeline, alerts, orders, and tracking are available after signup.

Contact our team

Case status and court context

The matter is associated with High Court of Bombay at Goa. Its public reference is 5716b08eae8b, and the available year information is 2010.

Jurisdiction

The public jurisdiction or bench context for this case is High Court of Bombay at Goa.

Case management with CaseDocker

CaseDocker helps legal teams organize court matters, calendar updates, documents, parties, and internal work without exposing private workspace data on this public page.

Frequently asked questions

What is ENTERTAINMENT SOCIETY OF GOA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER SHRI. VENANCIO FURTADO Vs RITZA WINE PVT. LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI. PRAKASH SANKPAL AND 2 ORS.?

ENTERTAINMENT SOCIETY OF GOA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER SHRI. VENANCIO FURTADO Vs RITZA WINE PVT. LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI. PRAKASH SANKPAL AND 2 ORS. is a public case listing for High Court of Bombay at Goa. This page gives only limited public-identification details.

Does this page contain full case records?

No. Full case files, documents, notes, and team activity remain inside authenticated CaseDocker workspaces.