CaseDocker Case Locator

SUSHILA N.RANGTA SOLE EXECUTRIX and LEGAL REPRESENT.C.S.GOENKA Vs WEALTH TAX OFFICER 16 (2) (4) AND ANR (RES) AND NIRAJKUMAR N. RUNGTA AND ANR (APPLICANTS) (2019) at Principal Bench,Original Side

Court: Principal Bench,Original Side
Year: 2019

SUSHILA N.RANGTA SOLE EXECUTRIX and LEGAL REPRESENT.C.S.GOENKA Vs WEALTH TAX OFFICER 16 (2) (4) AND ANR (RES) AND NIRAJKUMAR N. RUNGTA AND ANR (APPLICANTS) is a case connected with Principal Bench,Original Side. This public overview records the court, jurisdiction, year, and case reference so people can identify the matter before using CaseDocker for authenticated tracking and collaboration.

Full case timeline, alerts, orders, and tracking are available after signup.

Contact our team

Case status and court context

The matter is associated with Principal Bench,Original Side. Its public reference is 74efe10bb838, and the available year information is 2019.

Jurisdiction

The public jurisdiction or bench context for this case is Principal Bench,Original Side.

Case management with CaseDocker

CaseDocker helps legal teams organize court matters, calendar updates, documents, parties, and internal work without exposing private workspace data on this public page.

Frequently asked questions

What is SUSHILA N.RANGTA SOLE EXECUTRIX and LEGAL REPRESENT.C.S.GOENKA Vs WEALTH TAX OFFICER 16 (2) (4) AND ANR (RES) AND NIRAJKUMAR N. RUNGTA AND ANR (APPLICANTS)?

SUSHILA N.RANGTA SOLE EXECUTRIX and LEGAL REPRESENT.C.S.GOENKA Vs WEALTH TAX OFFICER 16 (2) (4) AND ANR (RES) AND NIRAJKUMAR N. RUNGTA AND ANR (APPLICANTS) is a public case listing for Principal Bench,Original Side. This page gives only limited public-identification details.

Does this page contain full case records?

No. Full case files, documents, notes, and team activity remain inside authenticated CaseDocker workspaces.